Genetic Accounts, Genealogy, and Lessons for the Study of Money by Graham Hubbs

In my previous post to the API blog, I closed by raising some questions about the relevance of history to the study of money’s ontology. I drew a comparison with chess. If you want to understand what chess is and how to play it, you study its constitutive rules. Its history might be interesting, but it doesn’t seem like you need to know anything about this history to understand the ontology of the game. The same line of thinking would seem to apply to pieces of mechanical technology, such as an automobile engine.

Teaching Case-Executive Briefing Note: President-Elect-Strategy to Solve Inequality by Dave Barrows

It has been quite an adventure so far. A classic middle class background with an undergraduate degree at Harvard and a PhD at MIT. The PhD was not required for what I wanted to do but it made my parents happy. I could also teach in the Boston area. I am 43 years old, married with two children, and an almost billionaire in Silicon Valley. Now is the time to make some serious money.

What is a Theory of Money? By Graham Hubbs

As is true of any other social kind, money can be studied in a variety of ways, for a variety of reasons, towards one or several of a variety of ends. A businessperson who wants to know how to make money might study the way it is produced in markets to enrich themselves. They might not think much about what, at its core, money is, even though it rules everything around them. Many academic economists, similarly ruled by money, likewise take next to no interest in its ontology even though they talk constantly about it.